Sunday, August 14, 2016

A Cat in the Brain (1990) and Artists Looking Back at Their Own Careers



Context plays an important role in what you consume.  A book might hit harder if brought into the context of the time when it was written.  A television show could depend upon news and headlines from the time of its airing.  A movie might need to be seen within a filmography of other movies to be understood.  Context is important in each of these situations.  Without proper context, you do a disservice to the movie and yourself.  That’s how I feel this week, since context is such an important part of the movie I watched.

A Cat in the Brain, also known as Nightmare Concert, is a 1990 movie directed by Lucio Fulci that was a culmination of his filmography.  Having never seen a Lucio Fulci movie before A Cat in the Brain, I wasn’t as understanding of the meta concepts as I could have been.  I took the movie at face value, watching what was presented to me instead of having the history of Fulci affecting my viewing.  The movie could have been more effective with that history to back it up.

Lucio Fulci played himself in A Cat in the Brain.  As he was working on a new splatter horror movie, he began experiencing PTSD.  He wasn’t able to eat meat because of the mutilated bodies in his movie.  When a yardworker at his home was using a chainsaw similar to one in a scene he had been shooting, his mind snapped and he attacked paint cans.  Fulci saw a therapist who used hypnotherapy to help him.  Only, it didn’t help him at all.  The hypnotherapy made him the lead suspect in a series of murders that were occurring in the local area.  He was experiencing events that seemed straight from his own movies.

This isn’t the first time that I’ve covered a movie where a director played a part in the narrative.  This has happened a couple times before and I think this post would be the perfect place to discuss this story element.  The examples that follow have a meta bent that allowed the director to come into the movie playing themselves.  They partially made fun of their own tendencies.  But they were also trying to tell a story that would be entertaining.  It’s not always successful, as some examples show.  They’re all interesting insertions of the artist into the art, though, and they are worth noting.

30 Nights of Paranormal Activity with the Devil Inside the Girl with the Dragon Tattoo
This was covered for week 10 of the Sunday “Bad” Movies.  It has been a long time.  I still have a hatred for it crawling under my skin when it is brought up in a post or in conversation.  It was one of the worst, most groan inducing experiences I’ve had.  None of the jokes worked.  Most would have been on a negative scale of comedy, actively taking away from any joy mined out of the concept.  It was a horrendous mess that didn’t know what it wanted to do.

The reason that 30 Nights of Paranormal Activity with the Devil Inside the Girl with the Dragon Tattoo gets into this post is because of a scene in which they broke the fourth wall.  When one of the characters was attacked, he stumbled through the house.  He ended up in the kitchen where the director and crew were behind their monitors.  The victim asked who they were and what they were doing.  They said that they were directing a movie.  It was a small unfunny joke in a movie filled with unfunny jokes.

The Human Centipede III (Final Sequence)
When I wrote about The Human Centipede franchise for week 180, I discussed the ways that the sequels delved into meta humour.  The second movie had the first movie exist within it.  Not the story.  The actual movie existed.  When the third movie was made, the first two were movies within the world of the third movie.  The characters in The Human Centipede III (Final Sequence) watched The Human Centipede (First Sequence) and The Human Centipede II (Full Sequence).

The second movie paved the way by having the first movie exist.  It also brought one of the actresses back to the franchise, this time playing herself.  It was a hint at what would come in the third installment.  The Human Centipede III (Final Sequence) saw many actors return from earlier in the franchise.  There were hints made to them looking like characters in the movies.  When the entire prison population watched The Human Centipede movies, they made comments that were ripped from negative reviews.  Yet the biggest meta moment was when Tom Six was brought into the movie playing himself.

The whole idea behind The Human Centipede III (Final Sequence) was to have the population of the prison sewn together, ass to mouth.  The prison warden, played by Dieter Laser from the first movie, wanted to have every prisoner sewn together because they would better obey him.  He asked director Tom Six to be a consultant so that they could get every detail of the procedure as accurate as possible.  Tom Six played Tom Six, the director of The Human Centipede movies, who was consulting on a human centipede procedure because of the experience he had making the movies.  He was a sizeable part of the story, having an effect upon what happened in the prison.

A Cat in the Brain
That brings us to the third and final movie that I’m going to discuss in this week’s post.  A Cat in the Brain, as I’ve already said, was the culmination of Lucio Fulci’s career.  It took the type of movies that he was known for and flipped them on their head by having him involved in that kind of story.  He was making the types of movies that hewais known for, but he was also living through them.  It was an intriguing concept that would have landed better if I was more acquainted with his filmography.

Even having not seen any Lucio Fulci movies prior to A Cat in the Brain, I still enjoyed the story.  Because it was so like Fulci’s movies, it was sometimes difficult to determine what was happening and what wasn’t.  You were going along with the director as his mind spiraled from his work.  Though the audience knew who the real killer was, the movie was so focused on Fulci’s mind that it blurred the lines between reality and fantasy.  He was going slowly insane and we watched every moment.

Some directors are fully aware of their style and tendencies to the point that they poke fun at it.  That is what Lucio Fulci did with A Cat in the Brain.  He made his style the story.  Many tropes from Lucio Fulci movies (which I know through hearing about them, or actual references in the movie) were present.  The entire movie was his look back on his own career and all the tendencies associated with it.  It was a good fictional story about his career.  I hope to watch it again in the future after seeing more of his movies.  Perhaps that will make it even better.



One of the joys of movies is taking a look at the past and using it to make more art.  Few stories are original anymore, and it’s the way that the stories are told that is the original quality.  Great artists know this and are able to play into it.  Wes Craven made New Nightmare as a meta look at the Nightmare on Elm Street franchise that he began.  Clint Eastwood made Unforgiven, which was a culmination of his western career.  Lucio Fulci came up with A Cat in the Brain to look back on his career in splatter horror.  Each artist knew their history and created their own tribute to it.

The great thing about this type of movie is that there is a shared appreciation of film history between the creator and the audience.  The artist (whether director, writer, or actor) knows what the audience knows, or may even be giving the audience a better look into the ideas.  For people who want to learn more about their favourite artists and movies, these are a window into that world.  They’re the best document outside of documentaries of a career, a series, or many other things.  And though some are bad (though I think A Cat in the Brain ended up being fairly good), they are insightful.  What better way to learn about movies than through other movies?  I can’t think of a better way.
Now for some notes:

  • A Cat in the Brain was suggested to me by @JonCohen6, who seems to have disappeared from Twitter.  I’m linking to whoever has the handle now.
  • One actor from A Cat in the Brain was in another movie.  That actor was Robert Egon, who was also in Captain America.
  • I wrote about 30 Nights of Paranormal Activity with the Devil Inside the Girl with the Dragon Tattoo and The Human Centipede in this post.
  • Have you seen A Cat in the Brain?  How about any of the other movies in this post?  Have you seen anything by Lucio Fulci?  If you’ve seen any of this stuff, you can discuss it in the comments below.
  • Another thing that you can talk about in the comments are suggestions for future Sunday “Bad” Movies posts.  If there’s a movie you would like to see me cover, let me know.  You can find me on Twitter if you don’t want to use the comments.
  • If you want to see some of the clips from many of the bad movies I watch, consider following me on snapchat.  My username is jurassicgriffin.
  • Next week, I will be covering a movie called Perfect.  It stars John Travolta and Jamie Lee Curtis.  It has something to do with working out.  That’s about all I know.  I’m interested in seeing it, so I’m excited for this coming week.  I’ll bring back a post for you once next Sunday comes.  See you then.

No comments:

Post a Comment