Film school is an interesting place. You get a small amount of money to make as
big a film as you can. It’s basically
micro-budgets. The only thing is that
film school normally involves making short films, and with that experience, you
can move your way into the bigger budget, longer length feature films that you want
to work on. Those longer movies will
take more money to produce because, obviously, they take longer to make.
That’s not always the case, though. There are some films that get to be an hour
or an hour and a half and have budgets comparable to those of the short length
student films. A whole subculture has
bloomed out of micro-budget film. Movies
get made for under $5000 all the time that are feature length. Most of them don’t get seen beyond the people
who made them, and their friends. They
tend to rot in someone’s basement. Some
of them get shared around and their audiences grow. Some of them explode. Most go nowhere.
The Final Sacrifice,
also known as Quest for the Lost City,
was one of the films that garnered an audience.
Most of that was due to Mystery
Science Theater 3000 featuring it in a 1998 episode, but still. An audience is an audience. The story was about Troy McGreggor (Christian
Malcolm), a young man being hunted by an evil cult. He teamed up with Zap Rowsdower (Bruce J.
Mitchell), a former member of the cult, to take down the people hunting him and
restore an ancient city to its former glory.
Movies with low budgets sometimes have a tough time getting made. Films cost money and when there isn’t much
money to go around, that budget can be blown quite easily. The
Final Sacrifice was made for approximately $1500 Canadian in 1990. Factoring inflation into the picture, that
would be about $2500 today. That’s still
not a lot of money.
One lesson I learned in my first year at film school was the
concept of “beg, borrow, and steal.” It
might sound a slight bit illegal with that last part. The idea behind it was meant to make everyone
think creatively on where to get the supplies needed for productions. Beg people to give you things that you
need. If that doesn’t work, beg some
more. Convince them to let you use what
they have. Borrow things from people
that you know will lend them to you. If
your uncle has an uninstalled bathtub laying around and you need one for your
set, ask if you can borrow it for the production and return it after. The stealing is slightly more
questionable. It didn’t mean that people
can go into stores and take whatever they want without paying. Don’t ever do that. That’s shoplifting and is a bad thing that
could get you in some major trouble. But
say you’re driving past a house where the fence was blown down and the people
decided that instead of reinstalling it, they would throw it out. Take it from their curb. Who is going to miss that fence? They were getting rid of it anyway.
Tjardus Greidanus definitely utilized the “beg, borrow, and
steal” method while making The Final
Sacrifice. For one thing, the camera
equipment that was used was borrowed from the school he attended, the Southern
Alberta Institute of Technology. That
cut down a good portion of the budget, as the crew didn’t have to pay for the
equipment they were using. Christian
Malcolm, who co-wrote the script and starred in the movie, was another student
at the Southern Alberta Institute of Technology. This meant that he probably didn’t have to be
paid for any of the work he did on the project.
The locations were likely a variety of homes owned by the people working
on the film, abandoned buildings, and secluded unpopulated outdoor areas where
permits didn’t cost money. With such a
low budget, the money couldn’t be thrown away to secure locations that had to
be paid for.
Using the “beg, borrow, and steal” mentality, The Final Sacrifice was probably able to
write off much of the normal production costs that more professional films have. This was a student film, remember. Most of the budget would have been eaten up
by the food that was necessary for the cast and crew. If the movie was done anywhere near normal
film standards, that is. If it wasn’t,
then the money could have gone anywhere.
Low budget films are hard to judge like that. There can be assumptions made about the
breakdown of the budget, but without having been there, it’s difficult to tell
where it went. Perhaps it was all used
for the special effects and sound effects.
Guns, car crashes, that sort of stuff.
It would all cost money and $1,500 doesn’t go to far.
Low budget filmmaking can be tough. It can be difficult to get the resources
required to make the film you want to make.
This is especially true the longer the film ends up being. A $1,500 budget in the early 1990s was a
small amount of money to make a short film, let alone the feature length
picture that The Final Sacrifice
was. The crew should be commended for
how well they used that budget and how the film that came out of it wasn’t all
that bad. It wasn’t the pinnacle of high
art or anything. The Final Sacrifice was an entertaining, messy movie. But it got made, and it wasn’t hard to follow
the story. It was a fun watch. Tjardus Greidanus did a good job getting his
team to make it.
Now let’s get some notes in here:
- The Final Sacrifice was suggested to me by @allflicker.
- Have you seen The Final Sacrifice? What did you think about it? Was it entertaining, or dull? Is Zap Rowsdower and awesome name? Let me know your thoughts in the comments.
- Do you have any suggestions for movies I should be checking out? Tell me about them on Twitter or in the comments. I’m always up for some movies I might not know about.
- Sometimes when I watch bad movies, I share bits and pieces of them on my Snapchat. If that interests you in any way, add me (jurassicgriffin).
- The post for the week after this one is for a movie called Road to Revenge. That post is also a little late. Bear with me here while I get caught up. Thanks, and again, sorry for being late on three of the posts.
No comments:
Post a Comment